<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will you pay to read The New York Times online?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimmacmillan.net/2009/02/06/unscientific-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimmacmillan.net/2009/02/06/unscientific-survey/</link>
	<description>Pulitzer-winning multimedia journalist. Teaching at NYU, advising warnewsradio.org at Swarthmore, leading Phiji.org at Temple U., and consulting for WebbMedia.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 20:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenelle</title>
		<link>http://jimmacmillan.net/2009/02/06/unscientific-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmacmillan.net/?p=1519#comment-363</guid>
		<description>I would definitely pay.  NYT has some of the best writing around.  I&#039;d probably re-start my paper edition first, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely pay.  NYT has some of the best writing around.  I&#8217;d probably re-start my paper edition first, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebradlee10</title>
		<link>http://jimmacmillan.net/2009/02/06/unscientific-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>ebradlee10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmacmillan.net/?p=1519#comment-353</guid>
		<description>No.  I&#039;ll never pay to access a newspaper website.

I think the commenter above makes a good point that people are way too cheap about paying for content.  But it&#039;s very difficult to go from a free to a pay model.   The NYT did it once and suffered...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  I&#8217;ll never pay to access a newspaper website.</p>
<p>I think the commenter above makes a good point that people are way too cheap about paying for content.  But it&#8217;s very difficult to go from a free to a pay model.   The NYT did it once and suffered&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kaczmarek</title>
		<link>http://jimmacmillan.net/2009/02/06/unscientific-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kaczmarek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmacmillan.net/?p=1519#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Charges are coming &amp; nothing on the web will be free.
You can&#039;t place enough adds on a single web page 
to pay the bills for an entire news gathering operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charges are coming &amp; nothing on the web will be free.<br />
You can&#8217;t place enough adds on a single web page<br />
to pay the bills for an entire news gathering operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina Chen</title>
		<link>http://jimmacmillan.net/2009/02/06/unscientific-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmacmillan.net/?p=1519#comment-345</guid>
		<description>Not sure why NYT times would think this would work now as it didn&#039;t work last time.

Would I pay? Probably not because everything else is free. Yes, only the Times is the Times, but there&#039;s so many sources to choose from today.

Now I read the Times only but don&#039;t subscribe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why NYT times would think this would work now as it didn&#8217;t work last time.</p>
<p>Would I pay? Probably not because everything else is free. Yes, only the Times is the Times, but there&#8217;s so many sources to choose from today.</p>
<p>Now I read the Times only but don&#8217;t subscribe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlanEggleston (Alan Eggleston)</title>
		<link>http://jimmacmillan.net/2009/02/06/unscientific-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanEggleston (Alan Eggleston)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimmacmillan.net/?p=1519#comment-339</guid>
		<description>&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/JimMacMillan&quot;&gt;@JimMacMillan&lt;/a&gt; Will you pay to read The New York Times online? - http://tinyurl.com/bw2ugp (Depends on what other sources are still free.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/JimMacMillan">@JimMacMillan</a> Will you pay to read The New York Times online? &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/bw2ugp" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/bw2ugp</a> (Depends on what other sources are still free.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

